In 2009 I was a "GIS Technician". Heaven help me, I was auto-completing polygons on good days and schema locking on bad ones, at a well-meaning but projection-free engineering firm with 300 AutoDesk licenses and 5 ArcEditor seats. It was the worst of times.
Early on that year I took a week off to go to Las Vegas with my wife, who was presenting at the AAG conference there (she's the brains of the outfit). Benefiting from the super-low "Spouse" attendance fee (academic geographers take note), I wandered from one cool session to another, my brain stimulated in new and exciting ways. I watched in a standing-room only crowd as Jack Dangermond explained how mashups (remember those?) were going to solve Africa's problems, and I saw my first demonstrations of Object-Oriented Image Analysis and Hyperspectral wetlands detection. Cool enough, but there was something disheartening about the fact that 95% of the map crunching I saw was being done by ESRI products.
On a whim, I went to a panel session called "Open Source GIS". Probably for the damn novelty of it, but also maybe due to some lingering frustration from being license-bound while trying to do mapping work in my peace corps years. The little room was about 3/4 full and the panel consisted of some folks from USGS who used GRASS and PostGIS, and also an animated fellow named Andrew Turner from FortiusOne, who had a few things to say.
The Open Source GIS Panel at AAG 2009. Note the overdressed gentleman about to drop some science on us. (Photo courtesy of Shriram Ilavajhala) |
An early, misguided attempt to use GeoCommons in mapping global coffee production. Things have gotten better. |
- Open Source: OS software is just the tip of the iceberg. It fosters a culture of innovation and robustly supports the tools that people want most.
- Open Data: Geographic information should be a public good (Geo"Commons" - Get it?), and we can all benefit from driving maps into the public sphere.
I have no doubt that ESRI's resources will supercharge GeoIQ's pursuit of open data. If Jack and co. have the wisdom to scrap ArcGIS Online and replace it with "ArcIQ" the world will be a better-informed place. But I'm going to miss the code contributions of some talented individuals. I raise a glass to them for getting me started in this business.
Believe it or not, there are bigger fish to fry with GeoIQ than ArcGIS Online. Much of my job at USGS (on the User Centered Design for The National Map research project) has been to point at GeoIQ and say "just use that". Now that GeoIQ is an Esri product, a big barrier is eliminated in using it for things like Data.gov and NationalMap.gov.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree. This is a big win for data dissemination, opengov or otherwise. But I fear that this takes us back a few notches in the quest to end dependence on "Desktop GIS". GeoIQ was pushing people to see it all in a seamless cloud platform, and now folks can continue to just "Upload your GIS to the web". Processing, storage and delivery remain fragmented.
DeleteFor what it's worth, TileStache is a stamen project that properly lives at https://github.com/migurski/TileStache and acetate was a contracted stamen project. All credit to GeoIQ for funding that work, but the developers aren't going anyway anytime soon. Arguably GeoIQ's biggest open source contribution was funding schuyler's work on https://github.com/geocommons/geocoder/
ReplyDeleteAmen to that. I didn't realize that geocoder was subbed out, and it's been very useful to me. But while Stamen and GeoIQ occupy different niches in geospace, they both strike me as effective innovators and evangelists. I never would have expected to lose GeoIQ, which now makes me wonder if teams like Stamen are also threatened.
Delete